Figure 1. An unnamed U-shaped valley in the Coast Mountains of Tracy Arm-Ford's Terror Wilderness, Tongass National Forest, AK. Image credit: USGS.
About Glaciers

Glaciers exist on all the continents of the world except Australia. Most of the world's glaciers are found near the North and South Poles (for more information about Arctic and Antarctic glaciers, please see our pages on Greenland and Antarctica). A large number of glaciers, however, are found in mid-latitude and tropical regions wherever the right conditions exist.

Glaciers exert a significant influence on a landscape. As glaciers move across the terrain, they pick up rock and debris, carve valleys (see Figure 1), and create landforms. Flowing glaciers erode and scour the ground beneath and to the sides of them. These rivers of ice also pick up boulders, soil, trees, and other debris and carry it along in their flow. Once the glacier begins its retreat, however, this material is deposited wherever the glacier.s ice melts. Kettle lakes are formed when large chunks of ice fall off of retreating glaciers and melt, filling depressions in the ground. For more information on glacial formations, see the links below, which will connect you to some sites with photos and descriptions.

There are two main types of glaciers — valley and continental. Valley or alpine glaciers form in mountainous regions where movement is inhibited by valley walls. Continental glaciers, also known as ice sheets, are "dome-shaped mass[es] of glacier ice… greater than 50,000 square kilometers (12 million acres) (e.g., the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets)" (NSICD).

Glaciers can form in areas characterized by cool summer temperatures and heavy winter snowfall. These conditions allow enough snow to create and maintain the glacier while limiting loss of mass. Growth is largely dependent upon precipitation. In areas with the temperatures necessary for glaciers to form, low precipitation rates will lead to slower growth (such as in Antarctica). A healthy glacier has a mass balance of zero or can be positive. This means that the glacier is accumulating as much or more than it is losing through ablation — melting, evaporation, calving, etc.

In places where winter snowfall survives the melt season, each year's snowfall accumulates over the last. As the years go by and the layers add up, the pressure created by the upper layers begins to turn the lower layers to ice. The glacier becomes denser still as the ice crystals grow, taking up the air space in the layers. Light at all colors of the spectrum are absorbed by this ice except one — blue. This is what makes glacial ice appear blue.

Once a glacier accumulates enough weight, gravity and the pressure of its own mass force it to move downhill, in the case of alpine glaciers, or outward, in the case of continental glaciers. This is called internal deformation. Glaciers can also move due to sliding, or basal slip. A layer of water or soft sediment with some water in it allows the overlying glacier to move over it much faster because it acts like a lubricant. Water can either be in the landscape before the glacier gets there or can come from melt water accumulating on the top of the glacier and leaking through cracks in its layers (see moulins). According to the NSIDC, "Basal slip may account for most of the movement of thin, cold glaciers on steep slopes, or only 10 to 20% of the movement of warm, thick glaciers lying on gentle slopes."

Glacial flow depends in part on the climate — warmer, drier weather leads to glacial retreat, while colder, wetter weather creates the conditions necessary for building glaciers. When temperatures increase or there is significant evaporation due to wind and warmer weather, the glacier begins to retreat. During the past 60 to 100 years, the NSIDC states that glaciers throughout the world have tended toward retreat. The Center explains "Alpine glaciers, which are typically smaller and less stable [than continental glaciers] to begin with, seem particularly susceptible to glacial retreat" (NSIDC).

Glacial retreat world-wide
Figure 2. "On the left is a photograph of Muir Glacier taken on August 13, 1941, by glaciologist William O. Field; on the right, a photograph taken from the same vantage on August 31, 2004, by geologist Bruce F. Molnia of the United States Geological Survey (USGS)." Image credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center, W. O. Field, B. F. Molnia.

Over the last century, mountain glaciers worldwide have, on average, been decreasing in length and volume (see Figure 2 and links). Some have been disappearing at such a rate that they may completely disappear soon. In North America's Glacier/Waterton National Park, for example, there were about 150 glaciers when the park was established in 1910. Today the number of moving glaciers is below thirty. Dan Fagre, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist working in the Park, says, "The last one will probably disappear by the year 2030, tops" (Chadwick, 2007). There have been significant changes in the ice sheets and their tidewater glaciers as well, which are discussed in our articles on Antarctica and Greenland.

The glaciers in the famed North American park are not alone. A 2005 study of 173 glaciers across the world found that since 1970, 83% of surveyed glaciers were thinning at an average loss of 0.31 m/yr (see Figure 3) (Dyurgerov and Meier, 2005). According to the 2007 IPCC report, glaciers and icecaps have lost increasing amounts of mass since the middle of the last century. In the period between 1961 to 2004, glaciers and icecaps were losing 0.50 ± 0.18 mm yr.1 in sea level equivalent (SLE) in mass. Between 1991 and 2004, however, the rate was actually above the average, at 0.77 ± 0.22 mm yr.1 SLE (IPCC, 2007). The numbers differ regionally, with the strongest mass losses per unit area in Patagonia, Alaska, and northwest USA and southwest Canada. For example:

  • According to a 2007 study of glaciers in southeast Alaska and western Canada using aerial and spatial data, glacier surface elevations have dropped in over 95% of the area analyzed from 1948 to 2000. Some of the measured glaciers had thinned by as much as 640 meters (Larsen et al., 2007)!
  • A 2006 study of the European Alps found that .Alpine glaciers lost 35% of their total area from 850 until the 1970s, and almost 50% by 2000. Total glacier volume around 1850 is estimated at some 200 km3 and is now close to one-third of this value. (Zemp et al., 2006).

Why are glaciers retreating?

"Glaciers and ice caps provide among the most visible indications of the effects of climate change…" the 2007 IPCC report explains. Glaciers respond quickly to changes in climate because they generally lose more mass on an annual basis compared to their total mass. This is because the mass balance of a glacier is determined by the hydrological cycle, which is in turn determined by the climate. Variability in climate in glacier-producing regions creates variation in the size of a glacier. For example, at high and mid-latitudes such as Alaska and Scandinavia, accumulation tends to occur in the winter while ablation occurs in the summer months. In these areas, the hydrological cycle is controlled in large part by the annual cycles of air temperature (IPCC, 2007). Across the Himalayas, however, both accumulation and ablation primarily take place during the summer (Fujita and Ageta, 2000). On tropical glaciers, ablation takes place throughout the year, but accumulation is dependent upon seasonal precipitation (Kaser and Osmaston, 2002). Therefore, according to Kaser et al. (2004), the response of tropical glaciers to changes in climate lag by only a few years, compared to a response time described by Paterson (2004) of up to several centuries for the largest, coldest glaciers on the smallest inclines.

Figure 3. "Cumulative mass balances of selected glacier systems compiled from individual time series showing differing changes in time up to the last decade of twentieth century." The map on the left shows the information portrayed in the graph on the right of average annual rate of thinning since 1970 for the 173 glaciers measured in Dyurgerov and Meier (2005). This sample includes mountain glaciers only, not ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland or calving glaciers. (Larger changes are represented with larger circles in the map.) Image credit: (Map) Global Warming Art compiled from the findings of Dyurgerov and Meier (2005). (Graph) Dyurgerov and Meier (2005).

In general, glacial retreat has been tied to two main climatic changes. These are increased temperatures and changes in precipitation and atmospheric moisture. Other factors, such as solar radiation, also play a role in glacial retreat.

Air temperature is considered to be one of the most important factors governing glacial fluctuations (Houghton et al., 2001). While there is regional variation, the global average temperature has increased by about 0.74°C between 1906 and 2005 (IPCC, 2007). In many areas, warmer seasons are hotter and longer lasting than they were previously, while colder season temperatures have also increased. In Alaska, annual air temperatures have increased over the past 50 years — with winter increases double those experienced during the summer (Stafford et al., 2000). These increasing temperatures have been identified as the main driver of glacial retreat and melting. In fact, Rasmussen and Conway (2003) point out that the summer temperature increases alone could explain the losses experienced in Alaska and northwestern Canada. One reason for this is that these glaciers cover large areas at low elevations. "The greatest changes occurred at lower elevations but large changes are also apparent at higher elevations," state Larsen et al. in a 2007 study.

Increasing levels of precipitation are not enough to offset the effects of warmer temperatures in some areas, such as the Tarim River Basin in Northwestern China. Despite an increase of 23% in average annual precipitation from the period of 1956–1986 to 1986–2000, warmer temperatures have caused significant decreases in glacial mass and area (Liu et al., 2006). The Alps face a similar predicament. Model experiments in the European Alps show that a 3°C warming of summer air temperature "would reduce the currently existing Alpine glacier cover by some 80%" whereas a 5°C temperature increase would render the Alps almost completely ice-free (Zemp et al., 2006). According to the study's authors, "Annual precipitation changes of ±20% would modify such estimated percentages of remaining ice by a factor of less than two," reinforcing the significance of the role of increasing temperatures (Zemp et al., 2006).

Kilimanjaro and its rapidly dwindling glaciers are often pointed to as evidence of climate change. Retreat in tropical glaciers is due to what a recent study of Kilimanjaro's glaciers describes as a "complex combination of changes in air temperature, air humidity, precipitation, cloudiness, and incoming shortwave radiation" (Kaser et al., 2004). Melting due to an increase in temperatures, however, is not the primary underlying cause of loss of glacial mass on Kilimanjaro. The climate in the region has been getting drier since the end of the 19th century, which is likely the factor forcing glacier retreat on Kilimanjaro. A drop in precipitation and air moisture inhibits the glaciers' ability to add new snow. Additionally, glacial mass on Kilimanjaro is lost primarily through sublimation (conversion of snow and ice directly to water vapor). A 2007 study found that "glacier mass balance is 2–4 times more sensitive to a 20% precipitation change than to a 1°K air temperature change… The main cause of this sensitivity characteristic is the strong albedo feedback, which is significantly stronger than on mid-latitude glaciers. Results suggest that precipitation availability is crucial to glacier retention on Africa's highest mountain" (Mölg et al., 2007). The authors of the 2004 study report that, under present conditions, Kilimanjaro's glaciers will continue to retreat, and the mountain may lose its famous glaciers by mid-century, making it the first time Kilimanjaro glacier-free for the first time in over 11,000 years (Kaser et al., 2004).

Many locations are losing glacial mass due to a combination of increasing temperatures and changing levels of precipitation and atmospheric moisture. Connections between solar activity and glacier melting processes are also being explored. In a 2006 study, Hormes et al. measured long-term glacier length variations and found there was a significant correlation with the total solar irradiance. The IPCC (2007) also points to dynamic thinning as a culprit behind the disappearance of glaciers. Dynamic thinning has increased the velocity of a number of glaciers, leading to enhanced melting and calving rates as well as reductions in overall mass balance. Additionally, ice reflects sunlight, but the increase of dark, heat-retaining rock and soil left uncovered by retreating and melting glaciers in turn heats up the ground and causes more reduction in glacial mass.

Some glaciers are still getting bigger

Despite the worldwide trend toward retreat, a number of glaciers are growing. Dyurgerov and Meier's 2005 study found that Scandanavian glaciers were gaining mass balance. Likewise, certain glaciers in areas general retreat, including Alaska, are exhibiting evidence of expansion. A 2007 study showed that in 5% of the study area in Alaska and Canada, glaciers, such as the Taku Glacier, were experiencing thickening (Larsen et al., 2007). Fealy and Sweeny (2005) find "an increased moisture flux over the North Atlantic" as being behind glacier advances in Scandinavia. Other glaciers, such as the Taku, are getting larger mainly due to the fact they are tidewater glaciers in the late stage of their cycles. As such, they are losing mass primarily due to calving . which means they are losing mass in their ablation zones. With smaller ablation zones, the glacier tries to restore its mass balance, resulting in growth in the accumulation region and glacial advance (Larsen et al., 2007).

Anthropogenic or Natural Climate Changes?

According to Hormes, et al., "…glaciers show a response to changing climate, but cannot give any answer to the question about whether the forcing is natural or not" (Hormes et al., 2006). Glacial retreat, after all, is not something new. In the Swiss Alps, for example, glaciers were much larger during the Mini Ice Age than they are now. However, they have been both smaller in volume and shorter in length than they are currently at a number of times throughout the past 320 to 2500 years (Hormes et al., 2006). Additionally, there is now evidence that during the last interglacial period 125,000 years ago, some Alpine glaciers were smaller than they are now or even non-existent (Joerin et al., 2006).

Glaciers are particularly sensitive to changes in climate, and that is why they are pointed to as an indicator of climate change in general and of anthropogenic climate change in specific. The IPCC directly links current rates of glacial retreat to anthropogenic climate change in its 2007 report by saying, "The late 20th-century glacier wastage likely has been a response to post-1970 warming" (IPCC, 2007). (In the summary of the IPCC report it is also mentioned that "Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.") Around 1970, mean glacier mass balances were close to zero regionally and globally, leading scientists to believe they were close to equilibrium. Since that time, however, the global mean has tended toward a negative mass balance, indicating .glacier wastage in the late 20th century is essentially a response to post-1970 global warming. (IPCC, 2007).

Consequences of the disappearance of mid-latitude glaciers

There are likely to be significant and widespread consequences of glacial retreat and of the disappearance of glaciers. Many people across the world are dependent upon glaciers for water, energy, and safety. Additionally, many organisms, ecosystems, and ecosystem processes are reliant upon glaciers. Dr. Phil Porter of the University of Hertfordshire sums it up well when he says "There is a short-term danger of too much water coming out… and a greater long-term danger of there not being enough" (McKie, 2005).

Reduction in Availability of Freshwater for Consumption

Glaciers store about 75% of the world's freshwater. Some mountain cities and the surrounding regions are dependent upon glacier runoff for their freshwater supply (USGS, 2005), such as in South America. The Andes Mountains in South America are home to 70% of the world.s tropical glaciers, which provide water for drinking, agriculture, and hydropower for 30 million people (ESN, 2008). Quito, Ecuador, for example, draws 50% of its water supply from the Antizana and Cotopaxi glacier basins. La Paz, Bolivia draws 30% of its water supply from the same basins (Vergara et al., 2007). However, these glaciers are rapidly dwindling.

In some areas of Asia and the Andes increased glacial runoff has translated into more water in the areas' rivers. However, once the glaciers diminish, their hydrologic inputs will disappear as well. Many of the towns in the Andes region have already felt the impacts of water shortages for drinking water and agriculture. In El Alto, Bolivia, Vergara et al. (2007) mention "…water supply is now just about enough to meet demand during dry season." Despite projects to help with water supply, demand for water will outstrip supply in the La Paz-El Alto area by 2009. Quito, Ecuador is scheduled to run into serious water shortages by 2015 (Tehran Times, 2007). Additionally, crops have had to be relocated to higher areas that receive more water from the glacier, but that have poorer soil, limiting their yield. Domesticated animals such as alpaca are also suffering from lack of food, resulting in decreasing wool production. Where once the townspeople could rely on their own production, now they must buy fertilizer and other supplies (World Bank, 2008).

A report from the National Meteorology and Hydrology Service of Peru has found that Andean glaciers have lost 20% of their volume since 1970 (World Bank, 2008). Some, like the Chacaltaya glacier in Bolivia, have already lost up to 99% of their volume (World Bank, 2008). Scientists have predicted that the Andes will be glacier-free by mid-century (Tehran Times, 2007). In a 2007 interview, Walter Vergara, who was the lead author of the 2007 World Bank report and who also is the Bank.s lead climatologist, stated "All these ecosystems are changing very quickly. In fact, every year they change at a faster pace, which has all of us very alarmed" (Tehran Times, 2007).

A number of countries are highly dependent upon its glaciers and glacial runoff for energy production. In the Andes region, hydropower supplies 81% of Peru's electricity, 73% of Colombia's, 72% of Ecuador's, and 50% of Bolivia's (World Bank, 2008). In India, 50% of hydroelectric power is generated by runoff from Himalayan glaciers (Kargel, et al., 2002). Glacial runoff supplies hydropower for 50% of Switzerland's electricity as well (Paul et al., 2007). All of these countries face billions of dollars worth of investment in infrastructure to accommodate new types and sources of energy production, some of which release more greenhouse gases than hydroelectricity.

Figure 4. "Contributions of GIC, Greenland, and Antarctic Ice Sheets to present-day rate of sea-level rise (s.l.r.), along with their respective volumes and areas." Image credit: Meier et al., Science, 2007.
Ecological Needs

Humans will not be the only losers when it comes to depleted glacial runoff. "These changes are likely to have significant, widespread consequences for the fauna of alpine stream ecosystems," Brown et al. state in a 2007 report, "…it may be impossible to prevent the loss of species adapted to meltwater stream conditions as climate warms and snowpacks and glaciers shrink." Plants, animals, and other organisms that are strongly influenced by the hydrologic impacts of glacial ecosystems will suffer as river channel stability, water temperature, and suspended sediment load are drastically altered due to changes wrought by glacial wastage in meltwater contributions and valley geomorphology (Brown et al., 2007). Additionally, glacial runoff feeds a number of rivers and lakes, thereby serving significant purposes in the area ecosystems, as well as in general ecosystem processes. As glaciers disappear, the benefits of glacial systems and inputs of glacial runoff will likewise evaporate.


Because of rapid glacial melting and wasting, an increasing number of avalanches and floods have been occurring. Ice avalanches from steep or hanging glaciers, such as the 1996 avalanche from Gutz Glacier near Grindelwald, Switzerland, cause infrastructure damage and injury. Much more hazardous are glacial lake outburst floods (also called GLOFs or Jökulhlaups) which occur when glacial melt is dammed by unstable moraines at the terminus. The failure of this dam due to volcanic eruption, erosion, water pressure, avalanches or calving, or earthquakes, results in the release of the water in the glacial lake.

Glacial lake outburst floods have occurred across the world and at many scales. At the end of the last ice age, massive glacial outburst floods occurred, such as the Missoula Floods, which created the Columbia River Basin. The number of glacial lake outburst floods, however, has been increasing during the second half of the 20th century according to UNEP. A 2005 report in Nature indicated there has been a 10-fold increase in the number of glacial outburst floods over the past two decades alone. These floods are incredibly devastating, and result in economic losses as well as casualties. In 1985, water released from the Dig Tsho Lake in Nepal destroyed 14 bridges and caused $1.5 million in damage to a hydropower plant downstream. More recently, in 1994 an outburst at Luggye Tsho, 90km upstream from Punakha in Bhutan caused massive flooding and erosion on the Pho Chhu River, destroyed many buildings in the town, and resulted in 21 casualties (McKie, 2005). Accelerated glacial retreat due to climate change is already raising the likelihood and imminence of these types of catastrophes, especially in areas like the Alps, Andes, and Himalayas.

Sea level rise

According to the IPCC's 2007 report, "The most important cryospheric contributions to sea level variations arise from changes in the ice on land (e.g., glaciers, ice caps, and ice sheets)." In a 2007 study, Meier et al. agree, stating "Ice loss to the sea currently accounts for virtually all of the sea-level rise that is not attributable to ocean warming." According to Meier et al. (2007), however, about 60% (see Figure 4) of the ice loss is from glaciers and ice caps rather than from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets.

Since 1961, total sea level rise has been 3.1 ± 0.7 mm/year (Meier et al., 2007). Of that total, the IPCC (2007) points to glaciers as contributing about 0.50 ± 0.18 mm per year during the period between 1961 and 2003. During that period, the contributions to sea level rise of these glaciers accelerated — the rate increased to an average of 0.77 ± 0.22 mm per year from 1993 to 2003 (IPCC, 2007). As mentioned earlier, the largest glacial mass losses have been observed in Patagonia, Alaska, the northwest U.S., and southwest Canada. Therefore, the biggest contributions to sea level rise since the IPCC's Third Assessment Report in 2001 have come from Alaska, the Arctic, and Asia. (IPCC, 2007) (See Figure 5). According to Meier et al. (2007), this increase is "in part due to marked thinning and retreat of marine-terminating glaciers associated with a dynamic instability that is generally not considered in mass-balance and climate modeling." The study predicts that accelerating rates of glacial melt may lead to an additional 0.1 to 0.25 meter of additional sea level rise by 2100 above the IPCC projections (Meier et al., 2007).

Figure 5. "Cumulative mean specific mass balances (a) and cumulative total mass balances (b) of glaciers and ice caps, calculated for large regions (Dyurgerov and Meier, 2005). Mean specific mass balance shows the strength of climate change in the respective region. Total mass balance is the contribution from each region to sea level rise." Image credit: IPCC (2007) based on Dyurgerov and Meier (2005).
Sources of Further Information References

"Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Monitoring and Early Warning System." United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

"Glaciers and Icecaps". United States Geological Survey (USGS).

"Loss of Andes glaciers threatens water supply." Tehran Times, November 28, 2007.

"Melting Andean Glaciers Could Leave 30 Million High and Dry." Environmental News Service (ENS) (April 28, 2008).

"Retracting Glacier Impacts Economic Outlook in the Tropical Andes." World Bank, April 23, 2008.

Brown, Lee E., David M. Hannah, and Alexander M. Milner. "Vulnerability of alpine stream biodiversity to shrinking glaciers and snowpacks." Global Change Biology 13 (2007): 958.966.

Chadwick, Douglas H. "Crown of the Continent." National Geographic Magazine (September, 2007).

Cyranoski, David. "Climate change: The long-range forecast." Nature 438 (November 17, 2005): 275.276.

Dyurgerov, Mark B. and Mark F. Meier. "Glaciers and the Changing Earth System: A 2004 Snapshot." Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Occasional Paper 58 (2005).

Fealy, Rowan and John Sweeny. "Detection of a possible change point in atmospheric variability in the North Atlantic and its effect on Scandinavian glacier mass balance." International Journal of Climatology 25 (2005): 1819.1833.

Fujita, K. and Y. Ageta. "Effect of summer accumulation on glacier mass balance on the Tibetan Plateau revealed by mass-balance model." Journal of Glaciology 46, 153 (2000), 244.252.

Joerin, Ulrich E., Thomas F. Stocker, and Christian Schlüchter. "Multicentury glacier fluctuations in the Swiss Alps during the Holocene." The Holocene 16 (2006): 697.704.

Hormes, A., J. Beer, and C. Schlüchter. "A geochronological approach to understanding the role of solar activity on Holocene glacier length variability in the Swiss Alps." Geografiska Annaler Series A 88 A, 4 (2006): 281.294.

Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding , D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. Van der Hinden , X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson (eds). (IPCCc). "Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" [Houghton, J.T., et al. (eds)]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY USA: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

IPCCb. "Summary for Policymakers." In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Kargel, J. S., R. Wessels, and H. H. Kieffer. "A World of Changing Glaciers: Hazards, Opportunities, and Measures of Global Climate Change." American Goephysical Union, Spring Meeting, Abstract U31A-04 (2002).

Kaser, Georg, Douglas R. Hardy, Thomas Mölg, Raymond S. Bradley, and Tharsis M. Hyera. "Modern Glacier Retreat on Kilimanjaro as Evidence of Climate Change: Observations and Facts." International Journal of Climatology 24 (2004): 329.339.

Kaser, G. and H. Osmaston. Tropical Glaciers (UNESCO International Hydrological Series). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Larsen, C. F., R. J. Motyka, A. A. Arendt, K. A. Echelmeyer, and P. E. Geissler. "Glacier changes in southeast Alaska and northwest British Columbia and contribution to sea level rise." Journal of Geophysical Research 112 (2007).

Lemke, P., J. Ren, R.B. Alley, I. Allison, J. Carrasco, G. Flato, Y. Fujii, G. Kaser, P. Mote, R.H. Thomas and T. Zhang (IPCCa). "Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground." In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Liu, Shiyin; Ding, Yongjian; Shangguan, Donghui; Zhang, Yong; Li, Jing; Han, Haidong; Wang, Jian; Xie, Changwei. "Glacier retreat as a result of climate warming and increased precipitation in the Tarim river basin, northwest China." Annals of Glaciology 43 (2006): 91.96.

McKie, Robin. "Millions face glacier catastrophe: Global warming hits Himalayas." The Guardian (November 20 2005).

Meier, Mark F., Mark B. Dyurgerov, Ursula K. Rick, Shad O.Neel, W. Tad Pfeffer, Robert S. Anderson, Suzanne P. Anderson, and Andrey F. Glazovsky. "Glaciers Dominate Eustatic Sea-Level Rise in the 21st Century." Science 317, 1064 (2007): 1064.1067.

Mölg, T., N. Cullen, D. Hardy, and G. Kaser. "Mass balance of a tropical glacier and its sensitivity to climate fluctuations: Kilimanjaro, 5873 m a.s.l." Geophysical Research Abstracts 9, 11307 (2007).

Paterson, W. S. B. The Physics of Glaciers. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann, 1994.

Paul, Frank, Christian Huggel, Andreas Kääb, Nadine Salzman, Max Maisch, and Wilfried Haeberli. "Glacier change and related hazards in Switzerland." United Nations Environment Program (2007).

National Snow and Ice Data Center. "Glacier Story: A Tour of the Life of a Glacier."

Rasmussen, L. A., and H. Conway. "Climate and glacier variability in western North America." Journal of Climate 17 (2004): 1804.1815.

Stafford, J. M., G. Wendler, and J. Curtis. "Temperature and precipitation of Alaska: 50 year trend analysis." Theoretical and Applied Climatology 67 (2000): 33.44.

Vergara, W., A. M. Deeb, A. M. Valencia, R. S. Bradley, B. Francou, A. Zarzar, A. Grünwaldt, and S. M. Haeussling. "Economic Impacts of Rapid Glacier Retreat in the Andes." Eos 88, 25 (June 19, 2007): 261.268.

Zemp, M., W. Haeberli, M. Hoelzle, and F. Paul. "Alpine glaciers to disappear within decades?" Geophysical Research Letters 33 (2006).